Recent Lawsuit Verdicts, Settlements, and Case Information
Physicians and their insurance companies require that the terms of essentially every medical malpractice settlement in Oregon be kept strictly confidential. Therefore, we are not able to provide a list of the many recent settlements we have achieved for our clients. But here are some recent Verdicts and Judgments:
$13,000,000 in Judgments Awarded to Six Patients
In early 2015 Miller & Wagner, LLP finished the last of nearly two dozen lawsuits against a neurosurgeon for allegedly performing unnecessary spine surgeries on unsuspecting patients. The last of those cases resulted in the following Judgments in favor of six of the injured patients:
$4.7 Million, $2.4 Million, $1.85 Million, $1.75 million, $1.15 million, $1.15 Million
$12,000,000 Surgical Injury - Verdict (Oregon)
On Thursday, September 19, 2013, and after nearly two weeks of trial before a jury in Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, Dave Miller and Bob Wagner received a verdict of over $12,000,000.00 on behalf of their client, Tyson Horton, now four years of age. The case will likely be the first to result in a Supreme Court test of the constitutionality of a 2009 Oregon law which limits the liability of Oregon's largest hospital, and only medical school, Oregon Health and Sciences University (OHSU), to $1,500,000.00. The statutory limitation, or "cap on damages," has been on the books for years but has come under attack recently as being out of touch with the modern realities of OHSU's for-profit business operations. Unfortunately, it appears OHSU is intent on making young Tyson Horton the poster boy in its fight to keep its liability for costly medical errors limited by an arbitrary and out-dated statute.
Nearly four years to the day from the date of the verdict, Tyson Horton was operated on by surgeons at OHSU for removal of a malignant but highly curable tumor on part of his liver. The surgeons told Tyson's family that successful removal of the tumor would cure Tyson of his cancer and that his liver would regenerate naturally and without any damage. During the removal surgery, however, the surgeons mistakenly cut through vessels they did not intend to cut, thus destroying Tyson's entire liver. When emergency attempts to repair the damage failed, Tyson, now gravely ill, was life-flighted to Stanford University hospitals for help. The surgeons at Stanford told Tyson's family that Tyson's only hope of survival was an emergent liver transplant. There was no time to wait for a cadaver donor. Tyson's only hope was to receive a portion of his mother's liver. So, on September 21, 2009, both Tyson and Lori Horton underwent life-threatening surgical procedures to accomplish the donation and transplant and to save Tyson's life.
Three months later, on Christmas 2009, Tyson and his family returned to their home in Klamath Falls. Tyson and his family have spent the last four years riding the dangerous roller-coaster ride of a pediatric liver transplant patient. Multiple hospitalizations, trips to and from Stanford, life-threatening anti-rejection medications, constant monitoring, fear of complications and, of course, mounting medical bills, have been a constant in the Hortons life ever since. As of the time trial began, the medical expenses alone for Tyson exceeded $4,000,000.00.
OHSU finally admitted liability for the error in formal documents filed in court ten days before the beginning of the trial. But OHSU has steadfastly refused to fully pay the Hortons past medical bills, let alone Tyson's future expenses or damages for all the injuries and suffering they have caused him and which he will experience for the rest of his life. The jury unanimously told OHSU to pay all of Tyson's past medical expenses, provide funds for his treatment in the future, and compensate him for all he has and will go through. Unfortunately, OHSU is certain to appeal the jury's verdict. Miller and Wagner are confident the unanimous opinion of twelve Oregonians acting as one jury will prevail over OHSU's continued attempts to hide behind an out of date law.
Update on $12,000,000 Verdict in Horton vs Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU)
Below you will see the summary of this tragic case, which resulted in a unanimous verdict in favor of young Tyson Horton and against OHSU and its surgeon on September 19, 2013. Tyson's surgery and injury occurred on September 17, 2009, just over four years before a the jury's resounding verdict.
On Thursday, May 5, 2016, some six and one-half years after Tyson was injured, the Oregon Supreme Court delivered yet another devastating injury to Tyson and the Horton family: the Court found that OHSU, despite admitting its surgeon's negligence caused Tyson's many injuries, did not have to pay the judgment rendered by the jury. This decision came as a shock to Oregon lawyers watching the case closely, but more of a shock to Tyson's family, who still face over $2,000,000 in debt owed to Stanford University and its Children's Hospital, not to mention a lifetime of costs and uncertainty over Tyson's future.
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled that the Oregon Tort Claims Act-a collection of statutes governing claims asserted against Oregon public bodies-limits the amount of damages an injured patient can recover against OHSU to a maximum of $3,000,000. The Court threw out prior cases of its own to reach the conclusion that the statutory cap did not violate the Oregon Constitution. In a stinging dissenting opinion, Justice Martha Walters wrote: "Today, the majority not only deprives the Horton family of the right to the restorative remedy that the jury awarded, it also bargains away and belittles two constitutional provisions designed to guarantee justice for all." And, further, that "This court's duty is to ensure that the legislature's laudable intent to benefit the many does not trump and trample the rights of the one. We do not fulfill that duty in this case." Finally, Justice Walters correctly writes "[Our Constitution] provide[s] a constitutional structure that is designed to provide justice for all and a means to preserve justice for all. Today, the majority does real damage to that structure and to the real people it is intended to protect."
Miller and Wagner will continue to fight for clients who are injured by the negligent acts of medical providers, be they at OHSU or elsewhere. The takeaway from the Supreme Court's decision in Horton vs OHSU is two-fold: first, that for the time being, large claims against OHSU run the risk of being found limited by the legislature despite what a jury may decide; and, second, that the people of Oregon need to speak-and speak loudly-when legislation is proposed to pull OHSU out of the protection of the Oregon Tort Claims Act. This corporation has long since outlived its history as a public agency; it acts as a large, privately functioning business by investing millions of dollars in its own operation and more millions in the operation of other businesses, including a private health insurer, Moda. The time has come for the legislature, or OHSU itself, to put the lives and interests of its patients above the interests of its insurers.
$2.95 Million Jury Verdict - Negligent Pre-Natal Testing
In March of 2012, a Portand, OR jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of parents f a child born with Down's Syndrome, awarding cost of care damages in the approximate sum of $3 million. The case was thought to be one of the first in the country involving allegations of negligence in the performance of pre-natal testing, which caused the diagnosis of Down's Syndrome to be negligently missed by the health care providers.
$1.75 Million Jury Verdict - Wrongful Death from Central Line Catheter Negligence
In January of 2012, a Salem, OR jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the surviving children of a woman who died from a negligently placed line into her heart. Dave Miller and Bob Wagner argued the negligence on the part of the physician was so egregious as to warrant punitive damages against the physician. The jury agreed, awarding $1 million in punitive damages, as well as $750,000 in compensatory damages.